CMA CGM increases FAK surcharge for routes from Asia to Northern Europe

Shipping line CMA CGM has announced a general rate increase (FAK) for shipments from all Asian ports to all ports in Northern Europe (including the UK and the entire range from Portugal to Finland). Lan/Estonia).

The French shipping company said that this new updated FAK rate will take effect from August 15, 2023 (calculated on the date of loading on board at the port of departure) and will be applied to all types of containers. As follows:

Port of departure: all shipments from Asia (including Japan, Southeast Asia and Bangladesh)

Port of destination: all ports of destination in Northern Europe (including UK and full range from Portugal to Finland/Estonia)

Container type: dry cargo containers, overloaded containers, refrigerated containers and empty containers

Applicable FAK rates: 1,150 USD/TEU and 2,100 USD/FEU

Related News

Vietnam in ASEAN’s Cargo Hub Race: Long Thanh, Cross-border E-commerce, and the Credibility of Origin

Air cargo is heating up again in a very concrete way: speed is no longer just a company advantage—it is increasingly a national advantage. IATA recorded strong global air cargo growth and a record year in 2024, and in 2025 several months continued to set new highs in demand measured by CTK, suggesting this is not a short-lived surge. 

Cargo Fleet, Airport FTZ, and “Clean Growth”: How Vietnam Can Accelerate Air Logistics From 2026?

Air logistics is entering a new cycle. International demand is rising fast, shippers are prioritizing speed and reliability, and exporters face tighter scrutiny on documentation and origin. In this context, the real question is no longer whether Vietnam should expand air logistics, but how to build capacity in the right architecture—one that scales volumes while strengthening Vietnam’s role in regional supply chains.

Headline: Vietnam’s Logistics Digital Transformation: From Fragmented Systems to an End-to-End Integrated Platform

In recent years, “logistics digital transformation” has become a familiar buzzword across industry forums. Yet inside many day-to-day operations, the reality remains mixed: different software for different functions, heavy reliance on Excel and phone calls, and data trapped within departmental silos.

Related News

GLOBAL CONNECTION MILESTONE: GLOTRANS VIETNAM ATTENDS NEW YEAR DINNER WITH INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS

In late February 2026, the Board of Directors of Glotrans Vietnam attended a New Year Dinner & Dance hosted by an international partner, marking a meaningful milestone in the increasingly strong and expansive collaboration between Glotrans and its global partner network.

GLOTRANS VIETNAM CELEBRATES NEW YEAR PARTY – WELCOMING THE SPRING OF BINH NGO 2026

In the joyful atmosphere of the first days of the New Year, Glotrans Vietnam proudly hosted its 2026 New Year Party to welcome the Spring of Binh Ngo, with the presence of the Board of General Directors, the Board of Directors, and all employees across the system, including offices in Hai Phong, Hanoi, Da Nang, Quy Nhon, and Ho Chi Minh City.

GLOTRANS ANNOUNCES LUNAR NEW YEAR HOLIDAY 2026

Dear Valued Customers and Partners, Glotrans would like to respectfully announce the Lunar New Year holiday schedule for 2026 as follows:

Related News

DISPUTE OVER THE SHIPMENT OF ENZYMES IMPORTED FROM INDIA

The shipment of food additives was transported in container No. FCIU3301688 (20’), under B/L MPRSMUM1806, on the voyage from Nhavasheva Port (India) to Dinh Vu Port (Hai Phong, Vietnam) on 29/04/2017.

The Insured’s Duty to Prevent and Mitigate Losses

Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.

Insurance Contracts Do Not Automatically Terminate Due to Late Premium Payment

Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.