Cargo throughput in July for the Port of Los Angeles (POLA) and the Port of Long Beach (POLB) both declined, according to recent reports by each port.
Accordingly, the total volume of POLA stood at 684,291 TEUs (20 Foot Equivalent Units), down 26.85% per year from the July 2022 record of 935,423 TEUs. The July tally was about 18% lower than June's 833,045 TEUs, marking the highest volume month since July 2022, an "all-time" record month for POLA.
POLA's imports fell 25% year-on-year, to 364,208 TEUs, and exports stood at 110,372 TEUs, up 6%. Empty containers decreased by 39%/year, to 209,710 TEU, as demand for empty containers in Asia continued to decline. Year-to-date through July, total POLA volumes fell 24% year-over-year, reaching 4,821,670 TEUs.
"Global trade has eased as inventories at retailers and manufacturers remain elevated," Port of Los Angeles CEO Gene Seroka said in a statement. “American consumers are continuing to spend and will likely find more discounted items this year as we head into fall fashion and the holiday season.”
The Port of Long Beach (POLB) reported that total throughput reached 578,249 TEUs, down 26.4% year-on-year from July 2022, POLB said July had its highest throughput on record.
Imports fell 27.9% to 271,086 TEUs and exports fell 17.6% to 90,134 TEUs, of which empty containers fell 27.7% to 217,030 TEUs. During the first seven months of 2023, POLB volumes fell by 25.6%, to 4,310,925 TEUs year-on-year.
POLB officials cited adjusted trade routes, adequate warehouses and a shift in consumer spending toward travel, entertainment and other experiences as reasons for the month's sales. 7 decrease.
“I am confident we will see our numbers improve as we work with industry partners to rebuild our market share,” said Port of Long Beach CEO Mario Cordero. ". “Looking ahead, however, we anticipate a modest 'peak season' for shipping as consumers spend slightly less this year on back-to-school supplies and gifts in the coming year. during the holidays.”
For many years, logistics was viewed primarily as a back-end support function. Today, amid increasing global trade volatility, logistics has become a strategic factor directly influencing business growth, risk management capability, and long-term competitiveness.
Amid ongoing global supply chain restructuring, Vietnam is emerging as a key manufacturing and sourcing hub in Asia. The “China+1” strategy and the need for risk diversification are driving multinational corporations to expand their presence in Vietnam.
Entering April 2026, escalating tensions in the Strait of Hormuz have triggered a systemic disruption across global logistics networks. However, for Vietnamese import-export enterprises, the immediate risk is no longer confined to the Middle East. The critical pressure point has shifted to Asia’s transshipment hubs-most notably Singapore-where congestion is now constraining regional cargo flows at scale.
From May 19–22, 2026, GLOTRANS is honored to participate in the PPL Networks Conference, one of the world’s leading networking events for international Freight Forwarding and Logistics companies.
At VSCN Conference 2026, Mr. Vo Minh Phuc Thien, representative of GLOTRANS, shared valuable insights on the global landscape of the Logistics & Supply Chain industry amid rapid transformation driven by AI, geopolitics, and sustainable development trends.
May 18, 2012 – May 18, 2026 marks a proud journey of establishment and development. Today, Glotrans HCM officially celebrates its 14th anniversary. Fourteen years is more than just a number—it represents a journey of ambition to shape the flow of the logistics market, of shipments crossing oceans, and of trust nurtured through the companionship of valued customers, partners, and all employees.
The shipment of food additives was transported in container No. FCIU3301688 (20’), under B/L MPRSMUM1806, on the voyage from Nhavasheva Port (India) to Dinh Vu Port (Hai Phong, Vietnam) on 29/04/2017.
Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.
Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.
