UKVFTA PAVES THE WAY FOR VIETNAMESE TUNA EXPORTS TO THE UK

Vietnamese tuna is enjoying many advantages in the UK market thanks to tariff incentives from the UK - Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (UKVFTA).

According to official figures from the Vietnam Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers (VASEP), after three consecutive months of decline, Vietnam's tuna exports to the UK have increased sharply, with export value to this highly profitable market soaring by 56% to US$742 million.

In the first half of the year, tuna exports to the UK market reached US$3.6 million, down 5% compared to the same period last year.

VASEP also reported that tuna is sold in many types of products in the UK market such as raw, processed, sushi, sauce, cakes or breaded. Of which, canned and packaged tuna products are often consumed the most. However, the consumption of this product group has been on a downward trend since last year.

However, according to the Import-Export Department, Vietnamese tuna is gaining an advantage in the UK market thanks to tariff incentives from the UKVFTA. According to the commitment in the UKVFTA, in terms of tariffs, this agreement has a mechanism to continue implementing the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EVFTA), which means that import tariffs on fresh and frozen tuna products will be quickly eliminated.

The tariff rate for frozen tuna or fillets will be eliminated over a period of 3 years from 18% to 0%. For processed tuna used for canned tuna - the basic rate of 24% will be reduced over a 7-year schedule.

For canned and packaged tuna, the quota of 11,500 tons per year will be exempted from tariffs. After that, the original tariff rate of 20.5% will be applied, which will be reduced by 3.5% per year.

To enjoy tariff incentives, Vietnamese enterprises need to prove their origin. The regulations on Rules of Origin in the UKVFTA are similar to the EVFTA, with the origin criteria for raw and processed seafood in the UKVFTA being pure origin. This means that raw, semi-processed and processed seafood exported from Vietnam are considered to have origin under the UKVFTA Agreement when the seafood raw materials used in the production process are purely Vietnamese origin (born or raised, caught and processed entirely in Vietnam), and are not allowed to be imported from a third country outside the agreement.

Therefore, to promote tuna products to the UK market, according to experts, Vietnamese enterprises need to increase the application of science and technology, develop modern production and processing systems, thereby optimizing the production process to improve the quality and added value of products, helping Vietnamese seafood gradually reach international standards and create competitive advantages.

Source: Ministry of Industry and Trade

Related News

Logistics Market Report – April 2026: The Singapore Bottleneck, Hormuz Risks, and Strategic Implications for Vietnam’s Trade

Entering April 2026, escalating tensions in the Strait of Hormuz have triggered a systemic disruption across global logistics networks. However, for Vietnamese import-export enterprises, the immediate risk is no longer confined to the Middle East. The critical pressure point has shifted to Asia’s transshipment hubs-most notably Singapore-where congestion is now constraining regional cargo flows at scale.

Glotrans Vietnam Officially Participates in the 21st JCtrans Global Freight Forwarders Conference 2026 in Bangkok

The 21st JCtrans Global Freight Forwarders Conference 2026 took place from April 1st to April 4th, 2026 at the Queen Sirikit National Convention Center (QSNCC) in Bangkok, Thailand, attracting more than 4,500 logistics companies, freight forwarders

Glotrans Participates in the 15th WCA Worldwide Conference 2026 in Singapore

The 15th WCA Worldwide Conference 2026, organized from 9 to 13 March in Singapore, successfully brought together freight forwarding and logistics companies from across the globe. Hosted in one of Asia’s leading logistics hubs, the conference attracted thousands of freight forwarders, logistics enterprises, and supply chain professionals from many countries worldwide.

Related News

HOLIDAY NOTICE – HUNG KINGS’ COMMEMORATION DAY & REUNIFICATION DAY (30/4) – INTERNATIONAL LABOR DAY (1/5) 2026

Glotrans would like to inform our valued Customers and Partners of our upcoming holiday schedule as follows:

HAPPY 5TH ANNIVERSARY – GLOTRANS QUY NHON (April 23, 2021 – April 23, 2026)

April 23, 2026 marks the 5-year milestone of establishment and development of Glotrans – Quy Nhon Branch. Though the journey is not long, it is enough to affirm the resilience, dedication, and strong growth spirit of a young, dynamic, and promising team.

CROSS-BORDER PROJECT CARGO TRANSPORTATION | DOOR-TO-DOOR (Pingxiang – Huu Nghi – Quang Tri)

Glotrans has successfully completed a cross-border Door-to-Door transportation project, connecting China to Central Vietnam, involving a fleet of 9 trailer trucks, ensuring schedule compliance and safety throughout the entire journey.

Related News

DISPUTE OVER THE SHIPMENT OF ENZYMES IMPORTED FROM INDIA

The shipment of food additives was transported in container No. FCIU3301688 (20’), under B/L MPRSMUM1806, on the voyage from Nhavasheva Port (India) to Dinh Vu Port (Hai Phong, Vietnam) on 29/04/2017.

The Insured’s Duty to Prevent and Mitigate Losses

Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.

Insurance Contracts Do Not Automatically Terminate Due to Late Premium Payment

Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.