Hue, August 2-3, 2025
"One Team – One Will – One Journey" – this is not just a slogan, but the very spirit that ran through the 2025 Team Building trip of the Glotrans Da Nang and Glotrans Quy Nhon family.
Amid the majestic scenery of Bach Ma mountains, the serenity of Lang Co beach, and the historic charm of Hue Imperial Citadel, each member had the chance to set aside work, pause, and recharge with positive energy.
Here, we were no longer employees from different positions and branches – but a united team moving toward shared values: collaboration – creativity – sustainability. Every smile, glance, handshake, or warm embrace was a testament to the solidarity and genuine affection among members. The moments captured below tell the full story of that memorable journey – an indispensable part of Glotrans Central Vietnam’s cultural tapestry.
Glotrans Vietnam sincerely thanks the Board of Directors, the Organizing Committee, and all staff for creating such a wonderful journey together. The trip has ended, but the journey to conquer new goals still lies ahead.
With the spirit of “One Team – One Will – One Journey”, we firmly believe that:
Every excellent individual contributes to building a strong collective.
A united collective will drive the company to reach further and grow sustainably.
We would also like to extend our heartfelt gratitude to our valued customers and partners for your trust, companionship, and support throughout the years. Your confidence and precious cooperation have been the driving force for us to continuously grow, enhance service quality, and build a dedicated, resilient team.
Glotrans remains committed to upholding professionalism – responsibility – efficiency, and to walking alongside you on every logistics journey ahead.
Outside the United States, global demand for Chinese products is hitting new highs. Despite being a major target of U.S. tariffs, China has strengthened its trade relationships across Africa, Southeast Asia, and Europe in 2025. While China cements its role as a global export leader, the U.S. is increasingly shifting its focus toward self-reliance.
The “China +1” strategy, once seen as a temporary plan to diversify production outside of China, has now evolved into a long-term restructuring of global supply chains. Increasingly
Vietnamese food and spice producers are making steady progress in international markets by focusing on “real quality.” By combining authentic local flavors with strict international certifications, they are strengthening their competitiveness and building trust among global buyers.
Recently, Glotrans Vietnam once again affirmed its capability in the field of Project Cargo transportation by successfully completing a special shipment from Shanghai, China to Cat Lai Port, Ho Chi Minh City.
In the joyful spirit of celebrating Vietnamese Women’s Day on October 20th, Glotrans Vietnam organized a warm and intimate ceremony to express appreciation to all female staff across the system. The event was a heartfelt thank-you to the wonderful women – the “flowers” who contribute to the success and unity of the Glotrans family.
Recently, Glotrans Vietnam organized a warm and joyful birthday celebration for employees born in October across all branches and offices nationwide.
Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.
Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.
Company Q (Plaintiff – the Insured) and Company B (Defendant – the Insurer) entered into an insurance contract. After an insured event occurred, the parties could not agree on the value of the loss and therefore conducted an assessment. The unilateral assessment conducted by the Insurer was not accepted, while the independent assessment was only partially recognized.
