Europe remains one of the most important and promising export markets for Vietnamese enterprises, especially following the implementation of the EU–Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EVFTA). With a population of over 740 million and a total GDP of approximately USD 18 trillion, the region has a strong and diverse demand for imports ranging from agricultural products and processed foods to industrial goods, electronics, and textiles.
According to the latest data from the General Department of Vietnam Customs, Vietnam’s export turnover to the European Union (EU) reached USD 51.66 billion in 2024, marking an 18.5% increase compared to 2023. The EU currently accounts for approximately 12.5% of Vietnam’s total export value.
To meet the growing demand for trade between Vietnam and Europe, several major shipping lines have expanded their direct shipping routes. Most recently, COSCO SHIPPING, the world’s third-largest container shipping company, officially launched a new direct service from Cai Mep Port (Vietnam) to key ports in Europe. This direct route is expected to significantly shorten transit times and reduce logistics costs for exporters.
The new service eliminates the need for transshipment at intermediate hubs such as Singapore or Malaysia, thus improving schedule reliability and operational efficiency. This is particularly crucial in the current context, where global supply chains continue to face disruptions and volatility.
COSCO’s decision to operate a direct service from Cai Mep — one of Vietnam’s most advanced deep-water ports—highlights the country’s rising potential as a strategic logistics hub in the region. This development presents an important opportunity for Vietnamese exporters to expand their market reach, optimize transportation costs, and enhance competitiveness on the global stage.
Source: collect
For many years, logistics was viewed primarily as a back-end support function. Today, amid increasing global trade volatility, logistics has become a strategic factor directly influencing business growth, risk management capability, and long-term competitiveness.
Amid ongoing global supply chain restructuring, Vietnam is emerging as a key manufacturing and sourcing hub in Asia. The “China+1” strategy and the need for risk diversification are driving multinational corporations to expand their presence in Vietnam.
Entering April 2026, escalating tensions in the Strait of Hormuz have triggered a systemic disruption across global logistics networks. However, for Vietnamese import-export enterprises, the immediate risk is no longer confined to the Middle East. The critical pressure point has shifted to Asia’s transshipment hubs-most notably Singapore-where congestion is now constraining regional cargo flows at scale.
From May 19–22, 2026, GLOTRANS is honored to participate in the PPL Networks Conference, one of the world’s leading networking events for international Freight Forwarding and Logistics companies.
At VSCN Conference 2026, Mr. Vo Minh Phuc Thien, representative of GLOTRANS, shared valuable insights on the global landscape of the Logistics & Supply Chain industry amid rapid transformation driven by AI, geopolitics, and sustainable development trends.
May 18, 2012 – May 18, 2026 marks a proud journey of establishment and development. Today, Glotrans HCM officially celebrates its 14th anniversary. Fourteen years is more than just a number—it represents a journey of ambition to shape the flow of the logistics market, of shipments crossing oceans, and of trust nurtured through the companionship of valued customers, partners, and all employees.
The shipment of food additives was transported in container No. FCIU3301688 (20’), under B/L MPRSMUM1806, on the voyage from Nhavasheva Port (India) to Dinh Vu Port (Hai Phong, Vietnam) on 29/04/2017.
Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.
Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.
