ONE FORECASTS MORE DIFFICULT BUSINESS WHEN DEMAND AND FREIGHT RATES DECREASE IN THE NEAR FUTURE

Ocean Network Express (ONE) expects profit for the second half of fiscal 2022 to be lower than the profit it reported for the second quarter due to the effects of falling demand and a deteriorating freight market.

Reporting results for the second quarter ended September 30, 2022 ONE posted $5.52 billion in profit over the three-month period, up from $1.32 billion year-over-year.

The company recorded a sudden drop in demand in August and September, along with a sharp drop in spot container freight rates. “Despite the deteriorating market situation, freight rates remained high throughout the second quarter compared with the same period last year, supporting the profit figure,” said ONE. In the first half of fiscal 2022, the Japanese-owned container shipping company reported a profit of $11.02 billion.

Looking at the second half of fiscal 2022, ending March 31, 2023 ONE expects a significantly lower profit margin than reported for the first half of the year. “The drop in freight demand is expected to continue into the second half of the year, resulting in a forecast profit after tax of $4,250 million in the second half of fiscal 2022,” the carrier said.

As a result, the full-year profit forecast for fiscal year 22 is $15.27 billion, about $1.49 billion lower than the previous year. This reflects reduced demand and a deteriorating freight market.

 

Related News

PANAMA CANAL TO FURTHER REDUCE DRAFT LIMIT FOR NEOPANAMAX VESSELS

The Panama Canal will further reduce the maximum allowable draft for Neopanamax vessels from late August 2026 as water levels in Gatun Lake continue to decline.

DELAY INSURANCE: WHEN TIME BECOMES A MEASURABLE RISK

In modern logistics, delays are no longer viewed as mere inconveniences. They can result in significant financial losses, including reduced revenue, dissatisfied customers, increased warehousing costs, disrupted production schedules, and damaged business reputation

GLOTRANS SHOWCASES INTERGRATED LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS AT MTA VIETNAM 2026

From July 1–4, 2026, Glotrans is participating in MTA Vietnam 2026, one of Vietnam's leading international exhibitions for precision engineering, manufacturing, and supporting industries, held at the Saigon Exhibition and Convention Center (SECC), Ho Chi Minh City.

Related News

GLOTRANS – HANDS-ON LEADERSHIP, GROWING TOGETHER WITH OUR TEAM

Over the past few days, GLOTRANS’s General Director has been traveling between offices, from Da Nang to Quy Nhon, to personally attend meetings reviewing the business performance of the first six months of the year, assess each office’s operations, and work with the teams to set goals for the next stage.

GLOTRANS NATIONAL DAY HOLIDAY ANNOUNCEMENT 2/9/2026

GLOTRANS would like to inform our Valued Customers and Partners of our holiday schedule for Vietnam’s National Day (2 September 2026) as follows:

GLOTRANS 17 YEARS – PROUD OF OUR JOURNEY, MOVING FORWARD TO GREATER HORIZONS 15 August 2009 – 15 August 2026

A memorable milestone was celebrated by GLOTRANS and our valued colleagues, customers, and partners at a special event marking 17 years of GLOTRANS Vietnam – a journey built on dedication, resilience, connectivity, and a continuous drive for growth.

Related News

DISPUTE OVER THE SHIPMENT OF ENZYMES IMPORTED FROM INDIA

The shipment of food additives was transported in container No. FCIU3301688 (20’), under B/L MPRSMUM1806, on the voyage from Nhavasheva Port (India) to Dinh Vu Port (Hai Phong, Vietnam) on 29/04/2017.

The Insured’s Duty to Prevent and Mitigate Losses

Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.

Insurance Contracts Do Not Automatically Terminate Due to Late Premium Payment

Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.