As global supply chains continue to shift and the air cargo industry enters a new phase of post-pandemic restructuring, Southeast Asia is increasingly positioned as a strategic air logistics hub on the global map. Benefiting from its geographic location between Asia, Europe, and the Americas, the region is also riding strong tailwinds from manufacturing relocation, cross-border e-commerce growth, and rising demand for high-value cargo transportation. At the center of this competition are five key airports: Singapore Changi (SIN), Bangkok Suvarnabhumi (BKK), Kuala Lumpur (KUL), Jakarta Soekarno–Hatta (CGK), and Tan Son Nhat (SGN).
Among them, Singapore Changi remains the undisputed regional leader. Handling close to 2 million tonnes of air cargo annually, supported by a highly integrated logistics ecosystem and extensive global connectivity, Changi serves not only as Singapore’s primary cargo gateway but also as a major international transshipment hub for Southeast Asia. Large-scale expansion projects such as Changi East and Terminal 5 are expected to significantly enhance long-term cargo handling capacity, further strengthening Singapore’s competitive advantage against emerging regional hubs.
Meanwhile, Bangkok and Kuala Lumpur are positioning themselves as strong regional challengers. Suvarnabhumi Airport (BKK) leverages Thailand’s large domestic market, competitive operating costs, and its role as a regional manufacturing base to attract international cargo carriers and logistics providers. Similarly, Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KUL) continues to invest in cargo facilities, bonded warehouses, and value-added logistics services, aiming to become a key distribution hub for ASEAN and South Asia.
Jakarta Soekarno–Hatta (CGK), supported by the largest domestic market in Southeast Asia, plays a crucial role as Indonesia’s primary air cargo gateway. While it has yet to match Singapore’s transshipment capabilities, CGK holds significant growth potential driven by rising import-export volumes, expanding manufacturing activities, and the rapid growth of e-commerce and consumer markets.
In Vietnam, Tan Son Nhat Airport (SGN) remains the country’s largest air cargo hub and a critical gateway for the southern economic region. Despite constraints related to land availability, infrastructure, and capacity, SGN still handles over half a million tonnes of cargo annually, serving key export sectors such as electronics, textiles, footwear, and seafood. Increasing foreign direct investment inflows, particularly under “China +1” supply chain strategies, are placing additional pressure on Vietnam’s air logistics infrastructure while simultaneously creating opportunities to enhance air cargo capabilities and integrate more deeply into the regional hub network.
Ultimately, the competition among Southeast Asia’s air cargo hubs goes beyond cargo volumes and rankings. It reflects broader national strategies within the global supply chain landscape. In the coming years, investments in infrastructure, digitalization, multimodal connectivity, and integrated logistics ecosystems will be decisive factors in determining each hub’s position in the regional and global air cargo arena.
Source: https://vlr.vn/hub-moi-noi-dong-nam-a-cuoc-dua-sgn-sin-bkk-kul-cgk-tren-bau-troi-hang-hoa-25240.html
In recent years, “logistics digital transformation” has become a familiar buzzword across industry forums. Yet inside many day-to-day operations, the reality remains mixed: different software for different functions, heavy reliance on Excel and phone calls, and data trapped within departmental silos.
After a challenging period characterized by global market volatility, Vietnam’s paper industry is entering a new recovery cycle with optimistic signals.
After two hot years driven by e-commerce and disruption in sea freight, the air-cargo market in 2025 is slowing as supply and demand gradually normalize, belly-capacity (passenger-aircraft freight space) recovers and trade policies fluctuate. For Vietnamese companies exporting high-value goods, this is the time to re-calculate the “sea-air mix” to optimize cost, time and shipment certainty.
Recently, Glotrans Central Region successfully hosted the Year End Party 2025 in a formal, warm, and highly connected atmosphere, with the presence of the Board of Management and all employees from Glotrans Da Nang and Glotrans Quy Nhon offices.
On the occasion of the Lunar New Year, as spring approaches, this is also a meaningful time for Glotrans HCM to look back on the journey we have gone through and to express our sincere appreciation for the dedication and contributions of all employees who have worked tirelessly for the development of the branch. Glotrans HCM successfully held the Year End Party 2025 with the attendance of the Board of Directors and all staff of the Ho Chi Minh City branch.
Recently, Glotrans successfully held the Year End Party 2025 for the Northern Region in a formal, warm, and highly connected atmosphere. The event provided an opportunity for the Board of Management and all employees to look back on the company’s journey throughout 2025, review achieved results, and align on development directions and strategic objectives for 2026.
The shipment of food additives was transported in container No. FCIU3301688 (20’), under B/L MPRSMUM1806, on the voyage from Nhavasheva Port (India) to Dinh Vu Port (Hai Phong, Vietnam) on 29/04/2017.
Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.
Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.
