According to recent data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), as of April 5, 2024, the United States has collected more than USD 500 million from newly imposed retaliatory tariffs—bringing the total revenue since 2018 to over USD 21 billion.
These tariffs have primarily targeted imports from major trade partners such as China, the EU, India, and more recently, Vietnam. They are part of the U.S. government's broader trade defense strategy, aimed at countering what it deems "unfair subsidization" by foreign exporters and protecting domestic manufacturing industries.
While these measures are intended to safeguard U.S. industries, they have also raised concerns among domestic companies due to increased input costs—especially in sectors like clean energy, semiconductors, and high-tech manufacturing. Numerous American trade associations have voiced opposition, warning that such tariffs could hinder innovation and delay energy transition efforts.
In Vietnam, key export groups—such as solar panels, electronics, and steel—are already facing the ripple effects of these tariffs. Businesses across logistics, manufacturing, and export sectors are closely monitoring developments while seeking to diversify export markets, particularly in the Middle East, Africa, and India.
As geopolitical competition intensifies, global supply chains are undergoing profound realignment. The trend toward supply chain restructuring, FDI reorientation, and technological self-reliance is becoming more pronounced. Vietnamese enterprises must proactively develop long-term strategies to navigate tariff barriers and seize new opportunities created by global shifts—especially by enhancing value-added capabilities within the supply chain.
Source: https://vneconomy.vn/my-cong-bo-tien-thue-thu-duoc-tu-thue-quan-doi-ung.htm
Air cargo is heating up again in a very concrete way: speed is no longer just a company advantage—it is increasingly a national advantage. IATA recorded strong global air cargo growth and a record year in 2024, and in 2025 several months continued to set new highs in demand measured by CTK, suggesting this is not a short-lived surge.
Air logistics is entering a new cycle. International demand is rising fast, shippers are prioritizing speed and reliability, and exporters face tighter scrutiny on documentation and origin. In this context, the real question is no longer whether Vietnam should expand air logistics, but how to build capacity in the right architecture—one that scales volumes while strengthening Vietnam’s role in regional supply chains.
In recent years, “logistics digital transformation” has become a familiar buzzword across industry forums. Yet inside many day-to-day operations, the reality remains mixed: different software for different functions, heavy reliance on Excel and phone calls, and data trapped within departmental silos.
In late February 2026, the Board of Directors of Glotrans Vietnam attended a New Year Dinner & Dance hosted by an international partner, marking a meaningful milestone in the increasingly strong and expansive collaboration between Glotrans and its global partner network.
In the joyful atmosphere of the first days of the New Year, Glotrans Vietnam proudly hosted its 2026 New Year Party to welcome the Spring of Binh Ngo, with the presence of the Board of General Directors, the Board of Directors, and all employees across the system, including offices in Hai Phong, Hanoi, Da Nang, Quy Nhon, and Ho Chi Minh City.
Dear Valued Customers and Partners, Glotrans would like to respectfully announce the Lunar New Year holiday schedule for 2026 as follows:
The shipment of food additives was transported in container No. FCIU3301688 (20’), under B/L MPRSMUM1806, on the voyage from Nhavasheva Port (India) to Dinh Vu Port (Hai Phong, Vietnam) on 29/04/2017.
Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.
Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.
