The Global Supply Chain Pressures Index (GSCPI) reported at 1.05 in September 2022, just a quarter of the peak reported in December 2021, has shown that disruption The supply chain segment has been improved for the better.
The index is at this level similar to that reported in November to December 2020. While some ports, such as Houston, have seen high levels of congestion (around six weeks) due to an increase on output. Global port congestion appears to have eased from its December 2021 to January 2022 peak. The Freightos Baltic Index fell 9%, to $3.699, roughly on par with the World Containers Index of Drewry, has dropped to a third of its peak rates.
FBX12 reported a 22% drop in Nordic to China/Asia rates and recorded its lowest quote ever at $375. Meanwhile, US West Coast to China (FBX01) rates were reported at $2.435, even lower than those reported by Drewry's.
Cargo volumes at US ports also seem to point to/reflect this, with August throughput at the ports of New York, New Jersey, Los Angeles and Long Beach being lower than last year, around the time the indices peaked (September 2021). The reduction ranges from -0.5% to -16%. Global Schedule Confidence at 47%, close to December 2020 level, which reflects reduced Global Supply Chain pressure.
Everyone will focus on the US September inflation report, expected this week. This could give transportation analysts a signal where rates are headed in the near future. Rates are unpredictable, as the holiday season coincides with peak demand, however, this year has been pre-planned from importers and retailers and we could see a surplus of inventory in USA.
While China reopens this week, some analysts see the massive drop in spot rates as a selling proposition to further boost the country's exports, which have been quiet. Despite the negative overall picture, rates on US-Europe trade routes are at record highs as previously reported by Drewry's, similarly, rates on China-Africa and Europe trades Europe and South America also increased.
After a challenging period characterized by global market volatility, Vietnam’s paper industry is entering a new recovery cycle with optimistic signals.
As global supply chains continue to shift and the air cargo industry enters a new phase of post-pandemic restructuring, Southeast Asia is increasingly positioned as a strategic air logistics hub on the global map
After two hot years driven by e-commerce and disruption in sea freight, the air-cargo market in 2025 is slowing as supply and demand gradually normalize, belly-capacity (passenger-aircraft freight space) recovers and trade policies fluctuate. For Vietnamese companies exporting high-value goods, this is the time to re-calculate the “sea-air mix” to optimize cost, time and shipment certainty.
We wish our valued customers and partners a joyful and happy holiday.
On 23 December 2015, Glotrans Da Nang was officially established under the strategic direction of Glotrans Vietnam, marking an important milestone in expanding our nationwide network across Central Vietnam. From day one, the branch has carried the mission of becoming an efficient logistics gateway, contributing to the enhancement of Glotrans’ nationwide service network.
On the occasion of Vietnamese Teachers’ Day 20/11, Glotrans Vietnam would like to extend our warmest and most respectful greetings to all teachers, trainers, and everyone who tirelessly dedicates themselves to the mission of imparting knowledge.
The shipment of food additives was transported in container No. FCIU3301688 (20’), under B/L MPRSMUM1806, on the voyage from Nhavasheva Port (India) to Dinh Vu Port (Hai Phong, Vietnam) on 29/04/2017.
Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.
Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.
